Categories
Political thought Res Publica

Considerations on the Government of Poland by Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Rousseau: Love Your Country

On the eve of the 18th century Augustus II (the Strong) occupied the throne of the Commonwealth. He wasn’t legally elected by the nobility, and his various machinations dragged Poland-Lithuania into wars with Sweden and Russia. With Sweden’s intervention Augustus II lost his throne to Stanisław Leszczyński. With the support of Russia the situation changed again, and Augustus II regained his lost position. In 1717, at the Silent Seym (a session of parliament where none of its members was allowed to voice opposition) Augustus’s II ambitions to impose absolutist monarchy were curtailed, but, at the same time, Poland-Lithuania became Russia’s protectorate.

In 1732, expecting that Augustus II would die soon, Russia, Austria and Prussia, whose monarchs liked to style themselves the Holy Trinity, signed the Treaty of Three Black Eagles. Its main goal was to prevent the election of Stanisław Leszczyński or any other candidate backed up by France or Sweden, and, above all, not to allow for any reforms in Poland.

Stanisław Leszczyński was duly elected by the nobles, which led to the War of the Polish Succession, after which Russia placed Augustus III on the Polish throne.

When that king died, the three despots agreed for the election of Stanisław August Poniatowski, who became Poland’s last king. As Catherine the Great saw it, he was so poor and weak that he’d have no choice but to depend on the neighbouring powers in everything.

In response to Russia’s continuous meddling in Poland-Lithuania’s internal affairs a large number of nobles formed an armed confederation. The Confederation of Bar (1768-1772) is known as Poland’s first national uprising. With the help of Turkey and France it lasted for four years, and was eventually quenched by the joint effort of the Holy Trinity’s armies.

Since Catherine the Great liked to present herself as an Enlightened Monarch, the leaders of the Confederation of Bar, among whom was Kazimierz Pułaski (later known as the father of American Cavalry), were labelled as ignorant, intollerant conservatives, opposed to any reforms in the country. Yet it is difficult to agree such notions with the fact that one of them, Michał Wielhorski, was sent to Paris as the confederates’ envoy, in order to ask two Enlightenment thinkers: Gabriel Mably and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, to draft proposals for political reforms that would be applied when peace was restored.

The effect were two works: Du Gouvernement et des lois de Pologne by Mably and Considerations sur le gouvernament de Pologne by Rousseau.

Rousseau’s work, although well known to many 18th century Poles, was not published at that time. The English translation was issued as late as 1957. Complementary to the Social Contract it remains an important document for those who want to study Rousseau’s political theory. The former was a theory, the latter was an attempt to apply theory in practice. Rousseau’s advice was taken under consideration when the May 3 Constitution (the first modern codified European constitution) was composed.

The English version is now available at this blog. Go to: Considerations on the Government of Poland

My favourite quote:

You may not prevent them from swallowing you up; see to it at least that they will not be able to digest you.

9 replies on “Considerations on the Government of Poland by Jean-Jacques Rousseau”

This is all fascinating and new to me. When I took a course in European history in college, the focus was on England, France, Italy–a little on Spain and Russia. Poland was hardly mentioned. I am glad Sylwia is bringing to our attention this long overlooked part of history.

Like

To echo Linda: Fascinating!

It’s almost unbelievable that the first English translation of a work by such an important philosopher as Rousseau would only be published in 1957.

Two sentences struck me:

If Poland were, as I should like it to be, a confederation of thirty-three small states, it would combine the power of a great monarchy with the freedom of a small republic;

Sounds almost like the United States. It would interesting if Poland were a federation with government shared between two levels. Incidentally, the EU now has, what, 27 states?

Today, no matter what people may say, there are no longer any Frenchmen, Germans, Spaniards, or even Englishmen; there are only Europeans.

I think we can safely say that Rousseau was wrong (Wikipedia says that the word “nationalismus” was created in the 1770s), but how striking that he would say it.

Wonderful blog.

Like

Thank you for your comment, Pacze Moj! Actually there were similarities between the Old Republic and the US. One of the things were the “small states” or sejmiks (local parliaments). At that time it was the only way to apply democracy to anything larger than a city-state, and Poland-Lithuania was the first country to do it. Of course the US could learn from Poland’s and other country’s mistakes, so it all worked better there.

I’d say that Roussaeau was partly wrong about nationalisms, because, from his point of view, the European upper class was indeed very cosmopolitan. What had changed in the meantime was that the lower classes united within their nations to throw off the upper class. But, today, we’re again moving towards a more cosmopolitan society. That’s because our own situation has improved. We no longer need to fight against a clique of governments, we are the governors, just as the upper class was back then.

I visited your blog. I love your poems translations!

Like

Sylwia – Any more thoughtful posts coming up? Your posts shed a light on interesting and under reported parts of Polish history to those of us like myself who did not grow up in Europe(and did not study its history in detail).

Cheers

Like

Yes, thank you! I’m working on several posts, but I haven’t yet finished any of them. I’m rather chaotic these days.

Western Europeans don’t know much about Poland either, so it’s not a strictly American thing. Rather, an effect of the Cold War’s division of Europe into two spheres of influence. Late 19th century Americans were often quite knowlegable about Poland, which is likely why we returned onto the map of Europe thanks to their support.

Like

Hola! I’ve been reading your website for a while now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from New Caney Tx! Just wanted to mention keep up the great work!

Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.